We have a Universal Ethics Code for Scientists
It fits on two sides of A4 as a handy leaflet, and consists of three words all beginning with R.
I'm very tired and grumpy today.
|Date:||December 6th, 2007 06:19 pm (UTC)|| |
The code of ethics feels somewhat odd, because it doesn't promote the expansion of knowledge explicitly, which I'd consider (a) an ethical viewpoint and (b) somewhat of a defining force for a scientist.
|Date:||December 6th, 2007 07:24 pm (UTC)|| |
Is that odd? I'd have assumed it was taken as read, in the same way (say) a corporate code of ethics wouldn't bother to include "try to screw over the competition and make pots of cash".
|Date:||December 6th, 2007 07:25 pm (UTC)|| |
Also it does not begin with R.
|Date:||December 6th, 2007 07:48 pm (UTC)|| |
|Date:||December 6th, 2007 09:20 pm (UTC)|| |
I'm not sure that taking something as read is helpful when compiling a list of ethics is wise - you end up with people deciding that huge-uber-important-taken-as-read point is not needed and ignoring it.
|Date:||December 7th, 2007 01:57 pm (UTC)|| |
Reading, riting, rithmetic? Rest, relaxation, recuperation? Randy red-nosed reindeer? OK, I'll stop being silly now ;)